Deterrence or Deference? The Constitutional Court under the Rise of Populism in Serbia

Since the populist administration took power in 2012, emerging constitutional democracy in Serbia has been gradually changed for Schmitt‘s identity and plebiscitary conception of democracy. A shift towards ‘the political guardian of the constitution‘ was justified by the claim that the consent of the majority was the crucial ground of legitimation in politics, while the...

Panel 159, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM

Due Process Under Extreme Conditions: Burdens, Deference and the Judicial Function

In exercising judicial review in times of crises courts face a well-known dilemma: to defer or not to defer? Deference is prudent: The executive/legislature are better equipped to deal with emergencies swiftly and efficiently, as they possess the expertise, the wherewithal, and bear the responsibility for error. Exercising strict review may derail the governmental efforts...

Panel 159, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM