PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY

This panel seeks to explore the notion of the protection of constitutional identity through the following perspectives: The tools of constitutional guardianship, the constitutionalization of transitional justice, and the institutionalization of transnational networks of constitutional courts. More specifically, are tools of protection applicable across a variety of constitutional systems? If so, are there variations within...

Panel 18, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

DEMOCRACY IN AN AGE OF HYPER-LEGISLATION

In recent decades, successive Parliaments in Australia and elsewhere have proliferated an extraordinary amount of legislation. Notable features of this phenomenon are the complexity of these statutes and the breadth of discretionary powers bestowed on the executive government with a concomitant deleterious impact on fundamental rights. This panel explores various problems that arise from this...

Panel 24, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY AS A LIMIT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM AND SUPRANATIONAL INTEGRATION

The term “constitutional identity“ has emerged in jurisprudence and academic debate as a limit of constitutional reform and supranational integration. However, the basis of this concept is rather unclear and must be closely examined from a theoretical and comparative perspective.Therefore, the panel intends to clarify whether constitutions have implicit limits to their reform even if...

Panel 14, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

REFUGEE PROTECTION AT THE BORDERS OF INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW: LEGAL RESPONSES, EXCEPTIONS, AND POSSIBILITIES

Discourse surrounding refugee protection in the Asian context often presumes the absence of relevant legal norms since most states in the region have not acceded to the 1951 Convention related to the status of refugees. Given continuing resistance to accession, some claim that Asia has essentially “rejected“ refugee law. Others suggest that states have nevertheless...

Panel 7, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS: PROTECTORS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, OR OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL IDENTITIES – OR BOTH?

Regional human rights systems are between Scylla and Charybdis: On the one hand they should uphold the states‘ human rights treaty obligations. On the other hand, they should arguably show appropriate respect for value pluralism, for various expressions of the majority‘s conception of national identity, and regionally shared modes of ‘balancing‘ rights and other important...

Panel 22, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15