Do ‘Asian Values‘ on human rights exist?

To scholars and practitioners of international human rights law, the 1990s Asian Values Debate was irrefutably debunked by the Asian Financial Crisis and regional rights progress. Yet ASEAN states are stuck in a strange ‘time-warp‘ and invariably resurrect the Asian values defence to ward off ‘intrusive‘ human rights engagement, consequently preventing them attaining their ironically...

Panel 22, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Equality, Diversity and Pluralism: Examining Spaces for the Preservation of Minority Rights and Multiple Identities in the Struggle for National Identity and Security

National security policies in the post-9/11 world reveal a dangerous turn towards the politics of fear, especially in the wake of frequent attacks by ‘home-grown terrorists‘. Viewed from the prism of identity politics, particularly ethnonational pluralism, I take a three-pronged approach to examining the impact of national security policies on identity pluralism. I interrogate the...

Panel 25, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

From protecting individual rights to protecting the public: the changing parameters of populist driven criminal law and penal policy

It had been the case that in advanced liberal democracies, criminal law and penal policy were bound by clearly defined parameters, that then helped to distinguish governance in the democracies from the non-democratic world. And one of the features of citizenship in the democracies was the importance that was given to protecting individual rights in...

Panel 12, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Homoglobalism: Global Gay Governance

In 2016, the UN appointed an Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), and the World Bank announced the appointment of an advisor on SOGI. Both nominations are part of a wider trend of global institutions beginning to engage with LGBT issues. My paper considers what...

Panel 10, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Hyper-legislation and deference to the executive

Two particular features of hyper-legislation are the broad discretion that laws confer on government officials, and the extent to which they authorise officials to make decisions that restrict fundamental rights. These issues pose a challenge for courts, whose role it is to ensure that discretionary powers are exercised lawfully while respecting the mandate of democratically...

Panel 24, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15