Pluralising the Rule of Law

Armed opposition groups like the Taliban in Afghanistan and the FARC in Colombia often establish their own ‘courts‘ in territory they control. Can such rebel courts be seen as embodiments of the rule of law, or does the rule or law‘s association with state sovereignty preclude this? Drawing on fieldwork on the judicial practice of...

Panel 6, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Normativist Resistance

Constitutionalism properly so called is connected to a commitment to to self-government of free and equals through law. As such it is tied not only to a distinctive normative conception of public law, but also grounds justifications for resistance and revolution.

Panel 28, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Near Misses: Avoiding Constitutional Retrogression

There has been a good deal of attention to constitutional backsliding and erosion in many democracies around the work, including established democracies like the United States, Israel and Japan. Several newer democracies have failed completely. Understanding the processes by which backsliding occurs also draws our attention to cases in which it does not. What explains...

Panel 11, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Privacy and GPS investigation in Japan

In 2017, the Japanese Supreme Court held that warrantless GPS searches are illegal. This case shows the boundary of permissible investigation using high technology. Rapidly developing technology challenges legal research. The Japanese Constitution has no term for “privacy,“ and its notion and scope have been questioned in Japan. This paper reviews notion of privacy in...

Panel 4, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Privacy issues of artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence applications and Big Data technologies raise significant questions in the area of privacy. Users tend to disregard the fact that many databases they have provided their personal data to, are interconnected or are being harvested by data brokers. In this new era of Digital Age the privacy of citizens should be protected not...

Panel 2, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Refugee Acceptance and the Social State

On July 18, 2012, the German Federal Constitutional Court determined that cash benefits paid to asylum seekers for subsistence are unconstitutional according to the Asylum Seekers Benefits Act. According to the Court, the benefits are evidently insufficient and incompatible with the fundamental right to a minimum existence, which is protected as the right to human...

Panel 17, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15