THE (PREDICTABLY) IRRATIONAL SACRIFICE OF FREEDOM FOR SECURITY – A BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVE

Liberal democracies are increasingly exposed to external and internal “threats“. The reaction tends to be to limit freedom in pursuit of security. Liberal democracies risk to sacrifice the very pillars that define them – democracy, individual liberties, social tolerance – to purportedly safeguard themselves. How come? The paper argues that common biases, wrong probability calculations,...

Panel 115, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

The forgotten alternative: Ancient political thought

Goldoni‘s and Wilkinson‘s “material constitution“ offers one of the most elaborate alternatives to the constitutional normativism of our time. It is sociologically rich and pays heed to the economic forces underpinning a constitutional regime. Yet, along with other “sociological“ and “political“ approaches to constitutionalism it does not take into account that modern constitutional law emerges...

Panel 102, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

The EU‘s compliance with environmental law standards established in the Aarhus Convention: coming together or drifting apart?

The EU is a Party to the Aarhus Convention (the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters), which establishes a set of environmental law standards in those areas. While implementing the Convention, the EU sometimes went beyond but other times has fallen short of the standards...

Panel 100, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

The Politics of Judicial Engagement with Constitutional Amendments

Constitutional amendment is a common method by which political branches bring about constitutional change. Some of these amendments however may critically transform the existing constitutional arrangement to serve what Landau and Dixon have called “abusive“ constitutional aims. This paper examines recent judicial engagements with constitutional amendments in Singapore and Malaysia. In particular, it highlights the...

Panel 95, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

The paradoxical regulation of mass surveillance in Britain, 2013-2016

After the Snowden revelations, Britain’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), an administrative panel dealing with illegal interception of communication, heard a series of complaints from NGOs. The Tribunal sat in public, treating the complaints as hypothetical scenarios: so-called ‘assumed facts’. The assumed facts enabled legal argument to proceed while protecting government secrecy. It determined in two...

Panel 115, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

The Multilateral Investment Court project: Assessing the Contribution of the European Union – Vietnam FTA

In the EU-Vietnam FTA (EVFTA) the typical investor-State dispute settlement mechanism has been replaced with a different, new model. The paper will sketch out the main differences between the two mechanisms and suggest where the Vietnam government may expect certain difficulties with implementation of the new system. Moreover, the EVFTA mechanism is intended to be...

Panel 114, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

The limits of (digital) constitutionalism: Exploring the privacy-security (im)balance in Australia

This presentation explores the challenges of digital constitutionalism in practice through a case study examining how concepts of privacy and security have been framed and contested in Australian cyber security and telecommunications policy-making over the last decade. We seek to understand if, and how, principles of digital constitutionalism have been incorporated at the national level....

Panel 115, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM