The question of discrimination has been a point of convergence for clashing societal demands. Claims for identity and diversity accommodation have met increasing opposition in the form of assimilationist discourses on security and dignity. Due to its balancing function, antidiscrimination law has been on the frontline of these debates, crystallising questions over its scope, purpose and effectivity. Positive action, effects-based approaches, and discrimination by association are examples of the legislative and jurisprudential innovations designed to adapt, modernise and improve its protection. Yet, the question of effectivity can only be raised if the underlying normative purpose of antidiscrimination law is clarified. Often invoked in the name of fundamental rights, where does antidiscrimination law stand on a value chart ranging from equality to autonomy? This panel discusses the impact of antidiscrimination law‘s recent technical and theoretical evolutions in a comparative fashion.