The Promise and Perils of Foreign Judges on Constitutional Courts

Several divided societies have reserved places for foreign judges on their constitutional courts. Drawing on quantitative evidence and elite interviews from Bosnia-Herzegovina, this paper considers both the intended and unintended consequences of this practice. First, the paper considers if a coherent theory for the practice can be gleaned from either constitutional structure and/or the subjective...

Panel 145, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

Foreign judges on constitutional courts: Global insights from Pacific experience

Foreign judges sit on courts of constitutional jurisdiction in more than 30 independent states across the world. The practice is particularly prevalent in the Pacific. Over the past 15 years, 187 foreign judges have served on the courts of constitutional jurisdiction in Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu....

Panel 145, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

Hybrid Constitutional Courts: Foreign Judges on National Constitutional Courts

Foreign judges play an important role in the constitutional or apex courts of a range of countries. Comparative constitutional scholars, however, have to date paid limited attention to this phenomenon of “internationalized“ or “hybrid“ constitutional courts. This article thus addresses this gap in comparative constitutional scholarship by providing a general framework for understanding the potential...

Panel 145, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM