Bringing Rigour to Fundamental Rights and Principles Reasoning

In the United Kingdom, fundamental rights and fundamental principles reasoning creates tensions on the frontier between law and politics, particularly between parliamentary legislation and judicial interpretation of statutes. As Lord Hoffman said in Simms ‘[f]undamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words’ of a statute’. The problem is that aiming to interpret ‘general...

Panel 163, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM

Settling Human Rights Violations

My paper explores the role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights as a human rights arbitrator through the use of friendly settlements. I discuss whether friendly settlement mechanisms provide better avenues for implementation of international legal standards. By forcing States to internalize the agreement they reach with petitioners, this mechanism creates a different power...

Panel 163, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM

The Systemic Approach to Human Rights

In contrast to the more traditional, liberal approach to human rights, epitomized by the work of the European Human Rights System, a more systemic approach has evolved within the Inter-American and African regional systems. This paper highlights the manner in which that approach has evolved through those systems‘ encounters with massive violations, transitional moments, and...

Panel 163, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM