Questioning legal personhood

Drawing on the works of Roberto Esposito and Jacques Rancière the paper seeks to unpack and revisit the notion of legal personhood and the correlated distinction between legal subjects and objects in contemporary EU law. Using the lens of asylum, its intended aim is to bridge the gap between the order of nature and that...

Panel 120, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

Public Participation in Administrative Decision-Making: A Northwestern China Story

Public participation in administrative decision-making is one of the basic avenues to realize publicans‘ rights. It is also the essence of publican mastering their own affairs. In recent years, China has carried on a valuable practice and exploration in public participation in the administrative decision. However, there still exist some problems: First, the main body...

Panel 113, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

Saved by the Court?

Most of the discourse regarding courts focuses on the debate between traditional and popular constitutionalism. Yet both approaches have faith in a strong political theory. In contrast with the trust in theory, I believe that our knowledge is largely determined by the present reality. That explains why there have been decades of research on high...

Panel 166, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM

Rule of Law and Democratic Legitimacy: Legislative Engagement in National Security

There is a common refrain, in US and UK legal writing, that an assertive exercise of judicial power particularly in matters of national security jeopardizes established institutional arrangements, most especially democratic accountability. When courts take the reins, the legislature loses the incentive to act and provide political/democratic checks on executive power. As the division between...

Panel 161, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM