Constitutional identities and the institutionalization of transnational judicial networks

In Asia, it can be observed that efforts are underway to institutionalize networks between judiciaries, including constitutional courts. As international dialogue and research is beginning to be institutionalized among networks of these “guardians of national constitutions“, how does this affect the identities of such associations and their members? This is especially an intriguing and also...

Panel 18, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Constitutional reform and the rule of law. Challenging democracy in times of crisis. A comparative study of the Greek and the Italian cases.

The paper considers the attempts recently made both in Greece and in Italy to amend the Fundamental Charters and their relation with the wider context given by the economic crisis and the emerging challenges to the rule of law. The comparative approach allows to detect similarities between the two cases and to envisage possible solutions...

Panel 29, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

Constitutional Transformation: Hungary

This chapter uses recent developments in Hungary to examine how the equivalent of political revolution can occur through changes that are, taken individually, in compliance in the constitution but collectively amount to wholesale transformation of the constitutional order. It confronts the question of what limits, if any, exist on constitutional revolutions of this type.

Panel 3, MONDAY 25 June 2018 16:45-18:15

Corporations are people too? – on the status of non-human legal persons in public law

This paper asks whether non-human persons, especially corporations, can be the subject of human rights, whether they can possess such rights.The paper attempts to offer a general, conceptual analysis of this question, irrespective of the particular legal system. A danger exists, that corporate resources, which individuals seldom have, will mean that the most prevalent use...

Panel 165, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM

Deliberative Federalism

Haig Patapan examines a theory of ‘deliberative federalism‘ that claims ‘federalism, in giving political and legal authority to disparate voices within the federal state, can make institutional room for deliberation‘, which in turn might have salutary effects on the protection of rights in federal societies. Considering evidence from the United States, they reach the conclusion...

Panel 33, TUESDAY JUNE 26 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM