JUDICIAL REVIEW AS CONTESTATION – FORMS AND JUSTIFICATIONS

This panel considers theoretical justifications for the institution of judicial review as democratic contestation, as well as the forms of judicial review that those justifications might suggest. The papers are connected by their apparent reliance on non-epistemic justifications; that is, justifications that recognize that judges have neither abnormal moral insight nor abnormal capacity to reason...

Panel 119, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

INFRASTRUCTURES AS REGULATION (INFRAREG): TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL TECHNOLOGIES AND THE ORDERING POWER OF PHYSICAL, INFORMATIONAL, AND DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURES

Infrastructures—whether physical, informational, digital—can have regulatory‐type effects. These include requiring, preventing, channeling, enabling, and nudging particular human and social behavior. Infrastructures also interact or compete with law. In these ways, infrastructures have major effects on social relations, identities, roles, capabilities, and possibilities. In today‘s world, infrastructures‐as‐regulation, and the enabling and controlling legal technologies and practices,...

Panel 139, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

INQUIRING OF JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING

This panel brings together various scholars of law and politics from Europe and United-States whose research in various fields (constitutional law, discrimination law and theory of law). They look at the contemporary outcomes of mechanisms of judicial decision making. As opposed to classical literature on legal reasoning, which is much concerned with legal interpretation, this...

Panel 121, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM