INQUIRING OF JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING

This panel brings together various scholars of law and politics from Europe and United-States whose research in various fields (constitutional law, discrimination law and theory of law). They look at the contemporary outcomes of mechanisms of judicial decision making. As opposed to classical literature on legal reasoning, which is much concerned with legal interpretation, this...

Panel 121, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

Judges and the Judging of Mixed-Race Racial Identity Discrimination Claims

A growing number of commentators view discrimination against multiracial (racially-mixed) people as a distinctive challenge to racial equality. This perspective is based on the belief that multiracial-identified persons experience racial discrimination in a manner that judges steeped in historic black-white notions of racism cannot comprehend. I dispute that premise and deconstruct its Personal Identity Equality...

Panel 121, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM

The judicial decision making protocol: the case of the French Conseil constitutionnel

This contribution explores the professional and social relationships that takes place within the Supremes Courts. It proposes to take the French Conseil constitutionnel as an example. Classical literature on legal reasoning, especially in France, tries to explain decisions by referring to rational choice theory (economic analysis of law for instance). In contrast, I focus on...

Panel 121, WEDNESDAY JUNE 27 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM